Binarylogic Searchlogic

Comments and changes to this ticket

• 

  Ben Johnson March 30th, 2009 @ 11:45 AM

  • State changed from “new” to “open”

  I think the best solution for this is default_scope. It's a new feature and I'm not sure if it works with search logic or not.

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  Vidmantas March 30th, 2009 @ 12:36 PM

  Well, in my case default_scope won't work, because in current situation that "default condition" depends on the user logged in. I mean conditions, ordering should be working - I'll check that

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  Vidmantas March 31st, 2009 @ 11:41 AM

  I've tried default_scope with both - :order and :conditions - options and searchlogic works nice as expected.

  Still, default_scope doesn't solve dynamic "defaults". It would be very nice feature while it's not needed by many programmers I believe :-)

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  aferra (at gmail) June 21st, 2009 @ 07:58 AM

  @Vidmantas

  Ruby to the rescue!

  There's a lot of ways you could do this but, this is concise an works well:

  def index
  search_options = (params[:search] || {}).reverse_merge(:order => 'ascend_by_username') @search = User.search(search_options) @users = @search.paginate(:page => params[:page]) end

  Best,
  Andy

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  aferra (at gmail) June 21st, 2009 @ 08:00 AM

  Jezz scuse the horrendous formatting.

  def index
    search_options = (params[:search] || {}).reverse_merge(:order => 'ascend_by_username')
    @search = User.search(search_options)
    @users = @search.paginate(:page => params[:page])
  end
  

  Dear Entp, 'preview' would be nice. :)

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  Vidmantas June 21st, 2009 @ 11:44 AM

  aferra, many thanks! Never heard about that method (reverse_merge), but now it's clear. Thanks!

• 

  Ben Johnson June 24th, 2009 @ 02:12 AM

  • State changed from “open” to “resolved”

  Let me know if you still have problems.